![]() ![]() ![]() Could you identify as easily the origin of a Microsoft Word or OpenOffice document? I’m not sure, because all of these documents will be very similar. Just take a look around: you can identify any magazine or any book collection because of their visual identity, which is made possible by the Desktop Publishing set of software. Text processors are very qualitative when it’s time to handle text (and this is an important point) but not when there is a need to customize a document. I’ve heard many people explain that they were trying Scribus, because they thought or heard it was a better piece of software. Once you go deeper into the details, you’ll see how Scribus is different. ![]() Especially, most of you would have certainly used text processors such as Microsoft Word, Writer, and maybe Microsoft Publisher. However, if you come from any other computer-assisted profession, you may be surprised at the way such software is organized. If you have already used layout software before, these arguments are not new to you. Desktop publishing software versus text processors This is mostly because proprietary equivalent software such as Adobe InDesign or Quark Xpress is not available for Linux-based platforms. You might be fully interested in free software, may be running Linux or any other system except Apple Mac OS or Microsoft Windows, and in this case, you don’t have much choice except for Scribus, Scribus, or Scribus. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |